karohemd: by LJ user gothindulgence (Seal)
[personal profile] karohemd
Interesting viewpoint and I think quite valid as "survival of the fittest" applies here and the panda is, quite frankly, too stupidill adapted to survive. It would be entirely different if all it took was to conserve or expand his habitat.

I'd be interested to hear what my naturalist/conservationist friends think about this.

(thanks to [livejournal.com profile] raggedy_man for the link)

Re: Habitat

Date: 22/9/09 09:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] professoryaffle.livejournal.com
This is very true. I guess the key with any conservation effort is what position does that species play in the web of life in that ecosystem. If pandas support lots of other life and without them other species would also die then more effort should be spent but if the ecosystem would continue in a very similar form without the panda it might not be worth it. Chris Packhams comments don't really cover that respect to the Panda

June 2025

M T W T F S S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 30 Jun 2025 06:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios