karohemd: by LJ user gothindulgence (Seal)
[personal profile] karohemd
Interesting viewpoint and I think quite valid as "survival of the fittest" applies here and the panda is, quite frankly, too stupidill adapted to survive. It would be entirely different if all it took was to conserve or expand his habitat.

I'd be interested to hear what my naturalist/conservationist friends think about this.

(thanks to [livejournal.com profile] raggedy_man for the link)

Date: 22/9/09 07:24 pm (UTC)
fearmeforiampink: (Panda)
From: [personal profile] fearmeforiampink
Y'see, to me a more important question is "Can we actually save it?"

Has the numbers dropped sufficiently such that the panda just won't survive pretty much whatever we do?

Also, what about the (making up numbers here) three/seven/twenty less cute but more viable species, that have more drectly been put in an insurvivable position by us, and that could be saved with the money that's currently being spent trying to save Pandas?

June 2025

M T W T F S S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 30 Jun 2025 03:11 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios