karohemd: by LJ user gothindulgence (Duftkaese)
[personal profile] karohemd

[Poll #996799]

ETA: The first pisstakes have started to appear on b3ta and [livejournal.com profile] deathboy's LJ

Date: 4/6/07 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philipstorry.livejournal.com
Oooh. It's not a logo, though.

Read the BBC article:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/other_sports/olympics_2012/6718243.stm

It's constantly being called a "brand" by these dribbling idiots.

Ew. Way to make the eternal games of peace and fair competition sound like, well, an opportunity for commercial rape of people's goodwill.

Welcome to the Most Commercial Games Ever. That greeting will be five bucks, please...

Date: 4/6/07 02:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karohemd.livejournal.com
Wasn't there a time when it was thought that commercialism would deter from the Olympic spirit and all advertising (be it sponsors on athletes' clothing or banners around the stadium) was banned?

Date: 4/6/07 02:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rirekon.livejournal.com
It is banned isn't it? I thought only Amateur athletes could enter the games, and part of being amateur is that you aren't sponsored...
Or did they change it?

Date: 4/6/07 02:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karohemd.livejournal.com
That used to be the case but there are definitely pro athletes now, just look at tennis and I doubt that none of the footballers are just amateurs, either so they must have changed it.

Date: 4/6/07 04:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philipstorry.livejournal.com
In the 1980s they changed it. Possibly for the 1980 Olympics, actually...

The problem was that Western nations were getting creamed, because they couldn't put their professional athletes in and so had to send their amateurs. Whereas the People's Glorious Socialist Paradises had plenty of unprofessional, unemployed folks who JUST HAPPENED to be supported by the State's Glorious Top Coaches, but not earning any money or competing in events professionally.

(Because no good Socialist would want to be so avaricious as to compete for money, comrade...)

So the IOC changed the rules, and it they still creamed us because they also had the People's Glorious Revolutionary Pharmaceutical Factory supporting them. But that's a whole different story... *grins*

Date: 4/6/07 04:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rirekon.livejournal.com
Lol, cheers for the history lesson :-)

Date: 4/6/07 04:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karohemd.livejournal.com
Nicely written. Cheers!

Date: 4/6/07 04:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philipstorry.livejournal.com
I think that stopped in the 80's, although Wikipedia noted in an article (as I researched this) that Coca-Cola sponsored one of the 1920's or 1930's Olympiads - their first sponsorship.

Date: 4/6/07 02:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] belak-krin.livejournal.com
also its nice to note the use of the phrase "each edition of the Olympic Games". All hail marketing consultants.

Date: 4/6/07 04:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philipstorry.livejournal.com
Edition. Nice - I hadn't spotted that.

Does this mean that in 2013, we'll have the Competitor's Cut Special Edition DVD Olympiad?

June 2025

M T W T F S S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 16 Jun 2025 08:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios