karohemd: by LJ user gothindulgence (TV)
[personal profile] karohemd
I realised a while ago that IR remote controls seem to have changed.

I remember the first remote control we had for a TV (in the mid-seventies) could be pointed anywhere in the room (or sometimes even into the kitchen if you pointed it through the wide open door and stood to the side so the signal could bounce properly) and it would change the channel, while most modern ones need to be pointed directly at the device to work.

Has anyone else noticed this? Was this a different system? The old one was definitely IR, too. Maybe the beam is weaker and tighter focussed or something.

Date: 5/1/09 05:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xambrius.livejournal.com
It's probably intentional. When I was a kid, I derived great pleasure from using our remote to randomly change channels on our neighbors' TV just by pointing it into their living room through the window, and I wasn't the only kid to play that prank.

--
Tim Harris
The Seeker
Time Lord

Date: 5/1/09 05:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karohemd.livejournal.com
Hehe, that might well be a reason.

Date: 5/1/09 05:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] susanofstohelit.livejournal.com
both of those sound right, plus I'd bet that individual remotes use a much smaller piece of the spectrum now. think about how many wireless devices you have compared to then. it would follow that everything gets a smaller piece of the pie.

Date: 5/1/09 05:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eryx-uk.livejournal.com
I was about to say the same thing. Our first remote TV could be used to change next doors.

I used to have a musical doorbell as well, where if anyone with a similar model doorbell within about 3 doors also triggered theirs!

Date: 5/1/09 06:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.com
Aha! That would be why my mum's doorbell used to randomly go off when there was nobody there not even kids playing knock knock ginger. Once the cat was sitting on the doorstep when it happened, which was confusing.

When I lived with [livejournal.com profile] daneel_olivaw in a thick concrete walled ex-council flat I had a mirror in my doorway so the wireless network signal could bounce off the mirror in the hallway, off that mirror and into my room. When I moved it, there was no signal! I had to browse the web with my door open.

Date: 5/1/09 07:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jupiter-jones.livejournal.com
Wenn ich meinen Sat-Receiver mit der Fernbedienung umschalte, dann mache ich damit meist auch meine Stereoanlage an :-(

Date: 5/1/09 07:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karohemd.livejournal.com
Hey, Du lebst auch noch? Wie geht's denn so? :o)

Date: 5/1/09 08:03 pm (UTC)
deborah_c: (GaFilk 2006)
From: [personal profile] deborah_c
Remotes are generally on the same frequency (or one of a very small number, anyway); generally it's the codes for individual buttons that differ between them, and the number space for key codes is far bigger than the number on a typical remote.

Date: 6/1/09 10:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pmoodie.livejournal.com
It's an intersting observation. I hadn't really thought about it before, but I'm sure you're right.

I do remember that our very first remote control was actually connected to the VCR by a wire! LOL

June 2025

M T W T F S S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 24 Feb 2026 12:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios