karohemd: by LJ user gothindulgence (Seal)
Ozzy ([personal profile] karohemd) wrote2009-09-22 01:46 pm

"It is time to let the Panda go"

Interesting viewpoint and I think quite valid as "survival of the fittest" applies here and the panda is, quite frankly, too stupidill adapted to survive. It would be entirely different if all it took was to conserve or expand his habitat.

I'd be interested to hear what my naturalist/conservationist friends think about this.

(thanks to [livejournal.com profile] raggedy_man for the link)

[identity profile] eryx-uk.livejournal.com 2009-09-22 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)
It may sound harsh but survival of the fittest. I think nature selected the panda to die off because lets face it, they don't breed very well.

[identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com 2009-09-23 08:30 am (UTC)(link)
It may sound harsh but survival of the fittest

On that basis, there's no point trying to preserve any species that's become endangered as a result of human activity. By letting themselves get predated to endangerment by us, or by letting us take over their habitats, they have proven themselves not as fit as us.

Which is a perfectly valid position to take, but it seems a pretty extreme one.