karohemd: by LJ user gothindulgence (Photo tele)
Ozzy ([personal profile] karohemd) wrote2008-10-30 06:41 pm
Entry tags:

BBC Wildlife Photographer of the Year

This year's results are out
The overall winner isn't that great a picture but getting anywhere near a snow leopard with a camera is obviously a feat so deserves praise.
There are some fine pics there and only two of them were taken with serious pro gear, the rest with entry level or pro-sumer cameras (but some rather good lenses). I like that they published the stats.
My favourite is the Clash of Eagles which looks more like a painting than a photo. Getting such a moment has to be a wonderful thrill for the tog.

(my icon is me photographing Magellan penguins in Chile)

[identity profile] davegodfrey.livejournal.com 2008-10-31 12:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I remember reading the stats in BBC Wildlife Magazine, back in the 1980s. They've always given make & model of camera, lens, film, and exposure details.

You can be that while only two of those images there used pro kit, the majority of the ones in the exhibition will have done, and I reckon the guy used the entry-level camera because it was cheap, and he needed several of them to get the shots at the various locations.

[identity profile] karohemd.livejournal.com 2008-10-31 01:05 pm (UTC)(link)
They weren't on last year's website. That's why I mentioned it.

*nods* I would assume that most wildlife photographers use pretty serious kit, not necessarily for the picture quality but built quality (metal bodies, good sealing against moisture and dust etc.).

[identity profile] davegodfrey.livejournal.com 2008-10-31 01:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't look at the website, I can go to the exhibition any time I like ;)

[identity profile] karohemd.livejournal.com 2008-10-31 01:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Bah. How long will it run (I assume at the NAtural History Museum)? I'll be down in London on the 22nd for Spamalot so could take a detour.

[identity profile] davegodfrey.livejournal.com 2008-10-31 01:26 pm (UTC)(link)
It usually runs until Mid-February.

[identity profile] karohemd.livejournal.com 2008-10-31 01:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Cheers!

[identity profile] bibliogirl.livejournal.com 2008-10-31 01:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Wouldn't surprise me in the slightest. One interesting change has been to see the film/digital ratio's change. Three, four years back the exhibited images were roughly evenly split between film and digital; last year the exhibited images had possibly four or five shots quoting film out of maybe fifty or so?

[identity profile] davegodfrey.livejournal.com 2008-10-31 01:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Even in the "Black and White" competition- which you'd think was almost designed for film there were digital entries.