Entry tags:
BBC Wildlife Photographer of the Year
This year's results are out
The overall winner isn't that great a picture but getting anywhere near a snow leopard with a camera is obviously a feat so deserves praise.
There are some fine pics there and only two of them were taken with serious pro gear, the rest with entry level or pro-sumer cameras (but some rather good lenses). I like that they published the stats.
My favourite is the Clash of Eagles which looks more like a painting than a photo. Getting such a moment has to be a wonderful thrill for the tog.
(my icon is me photographing Magellan penguins in Chile)
The overall winner isn't that great a picture but getting anywhere near a snow leopard with a camera is obviously a feat so deserves praise.
There are some fine pics there and only two of them were taken with serious pro gear, the rest with entry level or pro-sumer cameras (but some rather good lenses). I like that they published the stats.
My favourite is the Clash of Eagles which looks more like a painting than a photo. Getting such a moment has to be a wonderful thrill for the tog.
(my icon is me photographing Magellan penguins in Chile)
no subject
You can be that while only two of those images there used pro kit, the majority of the ones in the exhibition will have done, and I reckon the guy used the entry-level camera because it was cheap, and he needed several of them to get the shots at the various locations.
no subject
*nods* I would assume that most wildlife photographers use pretty serious kit, not necessarily for the picture quality but built quality (metal bodies, good sealing against moisture and dust etc.).
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject